Archives 2018

IN NEED OF HAY?

 

You may be wondering how to connect with other producers who have hay for sale, or you may have feed to offer for sale.  While more traditional methods such as the local paper or word of mouth might still work, consider looking to one of the other online resources for hay sales:

 

Alberta Agriculture Hay Listings http://www.agric.gov.ab.ca/app68/hay

Alberta Hay and Feed Directory https://bit.ly/2peYPQg

Ag Buy Sell www.agbuysell.com

Hay / Feed For Sale in Saskatchewan, Alberta & Manitoba https://bit.ly/2OufIS5

Kijiji Hay Bales https://bit.ly/2xhh2Bl

SCA’s Feed & Forage Wanted and For Sale https://bit.ly/2xqzbM8

Internet Hay Exchange has listings in Canada and the US http://www.hayexchange.com/

 

When searching for hay, be aware that there is no standard way that hay for sale is listed. It may be in short tons or metric tonnes, cents per pound or often by the bale. Be sure to ask what the bale weights are, and to ask for feed analysis to be sure the hay you buy will meet the needs of your livestock.

 

Do you know of any other sites? Share the link on our facebook in the comments and we will add it to this list.

Insect of the Week: Darksided Cutworm

Darksided Cutworm
Euxoa messoria
Week 2 (May 14) Darksided cutworm

Identification
adults: Forewings grayish, each with an oval and a kidney-shaped paler spot with darker margins among irregular dark lines. Wingspan of about 35 mm. mature larvae: Hairless, up to 37 mm in length. Grayish in color with a prominent white stripe along each side just above the legs; upper surface with a reddish background color. Head is orange-brown with darker spots.

Distribution
Native to North America. Distributed from Atlantic to Pacific coasts, north from the southern USA into southern Canada.Lifecycle
Females lay up to 1000 eggs in soil or under debris in cultivated fields. Mature larvae enter a non-feeding pre-pupal stage for about 30 days before pupating. One generation per year.

Hosts
Broad range of herbaceous and woody hosts including vegetables, cereals, canola, corn, tobacco, flax, sunflower, vine, berry and tree fruits.

Feeding damage
above-ground (climbing) cutworm: Larvae feed at night on the leaves and stems of young plants causing defoliation
and death. Areas of bare soil increasing in size soon after crop emergence may indicate cutworm feeding damage.

Monitoring/Control
Inspect bare patches and surrounding margins for larvae, which hide at the base of plants during the day. Count the number of larvae in a 50 cm x 50 cm area of the crop; multiply by four to estimate the number of larvae per m2. Repeat this process 5 to 10 times at 50 m intervals.

Insecticide treatments may be warranted if economic thresholds are exceeded, but take steps to minimize effects on natural enemies; see
General Control Options (p. 26).

Economic threshold
cereal and oilseed crops: 5-6 larvae/ m2 (Phillip 2015).
peas: 2-3 larvae/m2.
dry beans and soybeans: 1 small (<2.5 cm long) larva/m of row or 20% of plants cut.

Notes
Larvae are similar in color to redbacked cutworm. The most destructive pest of tobacco throughout most tobacco growing regions of Canada (Cheng 1984). Can be particularly damaging to buds of trees and shrubs (Walkden 1950).

 

For more photos and to view the full pdf click here–> Week 2 Darksided cutworm

Cutworm Pests of Crops on the Canadian Prairies: Identification and Management Field Guide

Prairie Pest Monitoring Network Blog

Rules Of Thumb For Livestock Drinking Water Quality

Water intake for dry beef cows is around 1-1½ gals./100 lbs. of body weight and this estimate can double for cows nursing calves.

Summer has arrived but there are many areas that don’t get enough runoff water to adequately fill the stock ponds, forcing producers to move cattle looking for forage and water. When drought causes a great reduction in surface water available in farm ponds, the issue of water quality becomes nearly as important as quantity of water available.

Water is the one most important nutrient required by livestock. Decreased intake can adversely affect health, reproduction and growth. Excessive salinity (salt) in livestock drinking water can upset the animals’ water balance and cause death. Unsafe levels of salt and toxins depend on the age of the animal, its stage of production and the amount of water consumed each day.

Water consumption is dependent on many factors. Water intake for dry beef cows is around 1-1½ gals./100 lbs. of body weight and this estimate can double for cows nursing calves.

Oklahoma has many potential sources for run-off pond water contamination.

  •  Soil minerals and salt leaching from the ground.
  •  Oilfield drilling sites and saltwater disposal wells.
  •  Agriculture application of nitrate and sulfate fertilizer.
  •  Animal manure and human waste control systems.

Suggested uses of livestock water containing different levels of contaminants are listed below: (remember 1ppm = 1mg/liter of water)

Nitrates: 100 ppm or less should not harm livestock.100-300 ppm should not harm livestock by itself, but beware of additive effects when animals are exposed to or grazing foodstuffs containing increased levels of nitrates (sudan, haygrazer and johnsongrass).
Sulfates: Water levels of 2,000-2,500 ppm and sulfate levels in foodstuffs allowing the animal to attain a level of 4,000 ppm or greater; can be associated with a neurological disease in cattle causing blindness.
Total Salts:

  •  Less than 1,000 ppm: These waters have a relatively low level of salinity and should present no serious burden to livestock.
  •  1,000-2,999 ppm: These waters should be satisfactory for all classes of livestock. They may cause temporary and mild diarrhea in livestock not accustomed to them, but should not affect their health or performance.
  •  3,000-4,999 ppm: These waters should be satisfactory for livestock, although they might very possibly cause mild diarrhea or be refused at first by animals not accustomed to them.
  •  5,000-6,999 ppm: These waters can be used with reasonable safety for dairy and beef cattle, sheep, pigs, and horses. It may be well to avoid the use of waters approaching the higher levels for pregnant and lactating animals.
  •  7,000-10,000 ppm: These waters are unfit for pigs. Considerable risk may exist in using them for pregnant and lactating livestock. In general, their use should be avoided, although older animals may subsist on them for long periods of time under conditions of maintenance and low stress.
  •  Greater than 10,000 ppm: The risk of these high salinity waters are so great that they cannot be recommended for use under any conditions.

A routine water analysis performed at a lab with the help of your county Extension educator or local practicing veterinarian can be very helpful and cost very little. This would take all the guesswork out of trying to decide which animals would be safe to drink the water and which pastures might be able to be grazed.

As ponds start drying up, the concentration of salt and toxic ions begins to increase in them. Do the young calves in the group have a mild diarrhea due to salty water or coccidiosis? Do the distillers by-product feeds (which can be high in sulfur) have the potential to cause blindness in creep fed to my calves? Are pregnant cows at risk while grazing sudan forage and drinking water possibly containing nitrates? All these questions might be answered by a simple, routine livestock water analysis.

 

Rules of Thumb for livestock Drinking Water Quality Article link

Cookin’ For Cowfolk

The 2nd edition of Cookin For Cowfolk is now available!

Cook Book Pdf available for download and viewing here:

LCC Cook Book 2018

 

The Cook Book will be available as a hardcopy version. If you wish to order a hardcopy version please contact the CARA office at 403-664-3777 or email Olivia at cara-3@telus.net. There will be a printing and mailing fee for the hardcopy version.

CATTLE AND SOIL WORKING TOGETHER

CATTLE AND SOIL WORKING TOGETHER

Jocelyn Velestuk, MSc, PAg

Good soil management is vital to the long-term profitability of any farm operation, including those involving cattle. Farms that raise cattle can manage to improve rather than degrade the land. Balancing the removal of nutrients with the addition of manure and other fertilizers as well as using practices to encourage good microbial activity/diversity and improve soil tilth and water infiltration can have long-term benefits. Minimizing erosion and compaction from cattle traffic is also important to maintaining the soil structure and proper functioning of the soil. Let’s take a look at some of the different practices that farmers can adapt to improve their soil health and make their cows and soil work together.

Manure Management

Manure is a valuable organic form of fertilizer and can be an asset to soil management. Areas with low organic matter or shallow topsoil can benefit greatly from manure addition. Soil quality is improved with the addition of manure, which supplies, in a sense, a slow release form of nitrogen (N) as well as organic carbon (C), phosphorous (PO4^2-), potassium (K), and micronutrients such as zinc and copper. Nitrogen in manure is in both plant available and organic forms. The organic N is transformed over time to plant available forms of N through microbial activity through a process called mineralization.

The highly variable composition and nutrient content of manure depends on feed composition, bedding, and storage. Manure that is composted will often have increased levels of plant available forms of N, such as ammonium and nitrate, compared to fresh manure. So how much do you apply to meet your crop nutrient demands? The amount of manure to apply is often based on the available P in the manure because the N to P ratio (N:P) is often different in manure compared to what plants require. Fields that have had manure in the past will often show consistently higher soil P and additional fertilizer N might be required to create balanced fertility for crop growth. The sampling of manure and soil by a qualified agronomist can aid in creating a balanced fertility plan.

Cattle manure and urine deposited directly on the land from in-field winter feeding systems such as bale grazing, chaff grazing, cover crop grazing, or bale processing/rolling on pasture or cropland can also return some nutrients to the land. Nitrogen in a winter feeding system may have increased levels of plant available N in the spring because of the decreased loss of ammonia from the decomposition of urea in urine directly deposited on soil versus a system where the manure is spread. Another efficiency of in-field feeding is that cattle do the nutrient spreading themselves, saving the producer time, labor, and equipment costs. Feeding can also be done in areas such as hilltops that can benefit from the organic matter addition of manure and leftover feed.

Considerations when animals are on the land including minimizing manure in low areas and around wetlands as much as possible to prevent manure from directly entering the water. High cattle traffic on moist soil in the springtime is also a concern if the cattle are not pulled off the land before the frost melts. Cattle hooves can cause compaction which can result in decreased crop yields. Limiting cattle traffic on cropland to when there are frozen or dry soil conditions can alleviate some of the compaction risks.

Straw and Forage

Baling and removal of cereal straw for cattle bedding following crop harvest exports nutrients from the land such as N, P, K and organic C. Rainfall on straw swaths prior to baling may leach some of the nutrients in the residue back into the soil, although some biomass losses can occur. Potassium is a nutrient that relies on leaching from crop residue to return plant available K+ ions to the soil. Continuous removal of straw from cropping systems might result in a decrease in available K. Organic matter losses from straw removal over time can also decrease soil quality and the soil’s ability to retain nutrients. Methods to reduce the effects of straw removal can include rotating straw removal between fields (i.e. every four years) and lengthening the period of time between removals to build a protective surface mulch. One other consideration is importing straw to bring nutrients in to rather than out of the farm. A management plan for straw removal is important to maintain the long-term productivity of the land.

Annual forage crops used for silage or greenfeed such as barley, oats, and corn are removed at an earlier stage than crops for grain harvest. The desire for high nutrients in the feed results in the removal of the above ground plant material at a stage when the plant is actively taking up nutrients which means a high level of nutrients is removed from the soil. This loss of nutrients should be accounted for in the soil fertility plan in order to maintain the soil nutrient status for the upcoming and subsequent growing seasons.

Perennial Forage Stands

Perennial forages with their extensive root systems are beneficial to soil health as they increase soil organic carbon, enhance soil microbiological diversity and activity, and maintain soil cover to prevent erosion. Including forage legume species, such as alfalfa, will allow for nitrogen fixation and increase the soil N as well as access nutrients and water lower in the soil profile. Declining productivity in hay stands can be due to decreasing levels of available nutrients in the soil from the continuous removal of above ground stands. Plant species like alfalfa use high levels of K and P, although fixing high amounts of N. Providing balanced fertility for the duration of the stand is, therefore, important when seeding and maintaining hay crops.

Grazing management is also integral to the long-term health of forage stands. Allowing grasslands enough rest period and implementing practices such as rotational grazing are essential to maintaining healthier plant stands for long-term production. As previously mentioned, cattle distribute nutrients in manure as they graze and maintaining plant cover decreases erosion potential and retains more nutrients.

Minimizing erosion is integral when managing soil and can be done through minimizing tillage and maintaining plant cover. Feeding cattle on grassed areas can eliminate the need to till manure into the soil. When seeding annual crops into terminated forage stands, using a low-disturbance seeder with a disc or knife opener can result in comparable crop yields to terminating via tillage. When the soil is kept in place, the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can create a network in the soil to increase the nutrient and water uptake of plants. A healthy, functioning soil has good microbial diversity including beneficial bacteria and fungi species. Soil that is left in place can also develop better soil tilth and structure over time, creating a better functioning soil.

A productive mixed farm operation is one that focuses on both the nutrition of animals and health of the soil. It all starts with balanced nutrition and adopting good management practices to make the soil and cattle work together. Tweaking the management of your farm can be as simple as making one change at a time with soil health in mind to suit what works for you and your farm. When farm management prioritizes maintaining soil fertility and long-term soil health alongside healthy cattle everyone wins!

 

This article was courtesy of the Saskatchewan Soil Conservation Association (www.ssca.ca) Spring 2017 Newsletter

 

Article PDF available here

The Magic of Mycorrhizal Fungi

The vital life under the soil is determined by the paths you choose on top of the soil.

Beef Producer Alan Newport | Apr 19, 2017

 

 

From the beginning of time, some agriculturists have marveled (if they thought about it at all) at the idea prairies and forests produced prodigiously without added fertility.

At last, we’re beginning to understand how such a thing can be accomplished, better yet mimicked.

A big part of the seemingly supernatural is done via a massive underground network of fungal superhighway that links many species of plants to microorganisms and transfers and shares huge amounts of vital plant compounds such as nitrogen, phosphorus, manganese, sulfur — all the major and minor plant nutrients — as well as plant-produced carbohydrates.

The star of this show is an organism called arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Together with its army of associated microbes, it can mine every major nutrient from the parent material of all soils, store huge amounts of carbon in the soil, hold and share water, moderate acidity and alkalinity, and build soil structure like nothing else.

Yet nearly every major agricultural practice of the past 10,000 years has torn it apart, to the detriment of mankind. As we have destroyed this life-giving fungi with tillage and set-stocked overgrazing and further with high rates of fertilizer and with long fallow periods, we have slit our own throats and made ourselves dependent on truly mined minerals, which we must draw out of nature with massive expenditures of human energy and millennia-old fossil fuels.

One example of this fungi’s magic is a compound it manufactures called glomalin, only discovered in 1996 by ARS soil scientist Sara Wright. It is a carbohydrate-based “soil glue” that contains 30-40% carbon. Glomalin is the substance that creates clumps of soil granules called aggregates. These are what add structure to healthy soil. They also keep other stored soil carbon from escaping.

Technically glomalin is considered a glycoprotein, which stores carbon in both its protein and carbohydrate (glucose or sugar) subunits. Because it stores so much carbon, glomalin is increasingly being included in studies of carbon storage and soil quality.

Further, scientists have found glomalin weighs from 2 to 24 times more than humic acid, which is the byproduct of decaying plants that once was thought to be the main contributor to soil carbon storage. Now scientists say humic acid contributes only about 8% of soil carbon.

As I alluded, glomalin is just one of the benefits of this amazing creature we’re calling AMF. The more we can harness its amazing qualities to help farm and ranch, the less money we can potentially spend and the more profit we should be able to make.

We’re focusing on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), what it does, and how to have more of it in the upcoming June issue of Beef Producer. So keep an eye on your mailbox. We’ll also publish all that material and more here on the website.

 

Thin, threadlike strands of mycorrhizal fungi hyphae from pot cultures have an abundant amount of glomalin—stained green in this picture by a laboratory procedure. Glomalin is ever-present on mycorrhizal hyphae feeding the roots of native and introduced grasses

Article Link

#SoilYourUndies

Anyone can investigate biological activity in farm fields or backyard gardens. Bury a pair of 100 percent white cotton underwear in topsoil for about two months and then check the level of decomposition. If there’s not much left of the underwear you have good biological activity, which indicates healthy soil. These same soil organisms can break down plant materials in much the same way.

Soil-Your-Undies-Protocol

 

Soil Conservation Council of Canada

 

Value From Your Soil Test

From the February 16, 2016 issue of Agri-New
Most producers test their soils routinely every fall, after harvest or early in the spring. Information from these tests give you the knowledge to plan the following crop’s fertilizer plan. How can you get the most return for this investment in testing?

There are several ways to soil sample. The most common method of soil testing is the 0 – 6 inch representative sample. You take 15 – 20+ samples in a field, selecting various slope positions, to try and get a good average sample. From those mixed samples the field sample is taken and sent away, hopefully giving you a good average for the field.

Another approach is benchmarking. That is where you pick one or a few spots in the field, have it located on GPS and come back to that same location for samples every year. It doesn’t give you an average but it can give you an idea as to how the field changes in nutrient levels, as long as you’ve picked a location that is average. That means it is not located at the bottom of the slope or right at the top but somewhere in the middle.

Using GPS, harvest records and precision agriculture has been gaining popularity lately where you try to correlate the harvest yields to detailed soil tests. This can give a more detailed picture of the ultimate productivity of the soil but requires several years of data to filter out the extremes from weather and vagaries of the crop year.

Different test labs have different procedures and you need to know what applies to your area and soils.
An example of this is the phosphorus test. The accepted, accurate test for phosphorus in the Canadian West is the modified Kelowna test. If your soil test lab is using some other test, it might be better suited to soils in Eastern Canada and may give a misleading result.
Macronutrients are the first thing you focus on from the tests. These are Nitrogen (nitrate), Phosphorus (phosphate), Potassium (potash), and sulfur (sulfate). There can be differences in how it is reported as it is often stated in pounds per acre or parts per million (ppm). If using ppm on a 0 – 6 inch sample, double the ppm to get your pounds per acre.

Micronutrients to look at are mostly just copper (Cu). Amounts below 0.6 ppm may show symptoms of deficiency. Ergot in cereals is linked to copper deficiency but the majority of the time ergot also occurs due to moist, cool conditions at head emergence. There is also a lot of hype promoting boron in canola. If you feel it might help, try a few test strips in the field and measure the results at harvest. Other than copper, most fields in Alberta do not show any symptoms of micronutrient deficiency and will not provide a yield boost if micronutrients are applied.

Organic matter (OM) is an important gauge of the nutrient bank account in your soil. High organic matter soils are much more forgiving if you cut your fertilizer rates for a year. It can compensate by providing more nutrients if the year is wetter than expected. Conversely, low organic matter in soil leaves it more susceptible to nutrient deficiencies. Very low organic matter leads to structural problems in soil with crusting and poor moisture penetration. OM increases as moisture regime gets wetter so black soils contain more OM than the brown or dark brown soils.

Soil pH is a measure of acidity or alkalinity. It is best at neutral, 7.0 but most crops grow well from a pH of 5.6 – 8.0. Once soils become more alkaline (higher) than 8 or more acid (lower) than 5.5 you start having limited choices for crop type. You can adjust pH with the addition of some bulk fertilizer products but volume needed to change pH usually make it uneconomical.

Electrical conductivity is a measure of how many salts are in the soil. Too saline and you limit what crops will grow and thrive. High salt content in the soil prevents the normal operation of osmosis which is how the plant roots obtain water. An EC of 1 or less is good. More than 1 and some crops do not grow well.

There are other tests and measures provided on some tests but they have limited value for the average producer. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) lets you know how many cations the soil particles can have adhering to it. It is linked to the amount of clay in the soil. High CEC just means there is a lot of clay in the soil.

If you do apply some micronutrients or “special” wonder products, measure and compare the results to assure yourself that these products do add value. Make every fertilizer dollar add to profits and not just costs.

Focus on the information you can use to manage the fertility plan for the coming year’s crops. If you need help with interpretation, call the Ag-Info Centre at 310-FARM (3276) you can also give Dr. Yamily Zavala a call at the CARA office for assistance in interpreting the results from the soil sampling. Watch for future development of CARA’s Soil Health Lab.

Identifying Types of Soil Compaction

Ross McKenzie, Grainews May 9, 2016

Soil compaction can occur at the soil surface in the form of soil crusting, or it can occur in the subsoil. Soil compaction is sometimes blamed for reduced crop productivity, but it is important to correctly diagnose the cause or causes of reduced crop production. Poor plant growth can be caused by a number of factors, including soil compaction.
The first step is to correctly diagnosis if a soil compaction problem exists, and then develop short- and long-term management practices to prevent further damage.
Soil compaction can occur at different times of the year through different mechanisms. Careful observations can help diagnose the problem. If the answer to these questions is “yes,” you may have a soil compaction problem.
-Is there poor crop growth in all years, with all crop types in the same area of the field?
-Is there a spatial pattern to the crop growth (associated with wheel tracks, windrows, equipment widths, haul trails)?
-Does the soil surface appear smooth and crusted?
-Has there been a change in equipment size, weight or operations?
-Are there soil types in the field with naturally dense horizons such as eroded knolls?
-If you scrape away the surface soil with a shovel or trowel, can you see dense layers and/or horizontal root growth?